DEVBOOST IS THE SMARTEST
ENGINEERING INTELLIGENCE TOOL
An all-in-one solution that provides predictive analysis, forecasts,
personalized recommendations, and actionable insightsFaster Speed To Market
On-Time Successful Release
Code Quality Improvement
Reduction In Costs
Better Process Governance
Better Utilization Of Team
DevBoost correlates multiple signals from different tools and provides - precise predictive analysis, accurate health risk
predictions, forecasts, personalized recommendations, and risk-mitigating actionable insights along with clear steps, thereby boosting productivity across various teams and increasing on-time project outcomes.Enter Your Company Details
Improved prioritization of engineering
investments
Cost savings due to re-allocating developer time to high priority initiatives. In many cases this also represents a decrease in future headcount needs.
DevBoost performance improvement gain = 10%
DevBoost basic product cost =
$20/user/monthTotal Annual Savings
$ 592,800
Total savings with DevBoost because of increased efficiency
$ 292,800
Savings from investment prioritization
$ 300,000
Total DevBoost cost for developers/year
$ 7,200
Scenario analysis for investment breakeven period (When you will get your investment back)
Payback Period on Perfomance Saving
6 Days
Payback Period on Overall Engineering Cost
0.6 Days
Within just 6 months of using DevBoost, we were able to improve quality from 70% to 95%, reduce the spillover rate to almost 0%, and increase the efficiency by needing only 5 resources instead of 8 resources.
Swapnil Tawar
CEO, Infeon IT Services
FAQs
I already get data from my Jira, Git, etc. Why would I need another thing to look at?
Git tools are code-first and designed for developers and team leads. Project Management tools are plan-first and designed for PMs. DevBoost is for the engineering leader who must move beyond “In Progress” to understand how things translate into efficiency, cost, and business impact. Our Co-founder, Aninda, who was engineering leader earlier, was frustrated he had nowhere to go every morning to see what was happening with his teams. He also hated answering (really guessing at) the same questions over and over again:
“When will this feature be ready?”
“Can he speed this up and deliver this month instead of next?”
“Can you take on this other ‘high priority’ project?”
“What is this project going to cost and what will the ROI be?”
The answers to these questions are hidden in unstructured data across silos that are meant for different roles. The only way to determine if your engineering practice is operating efficiently is correlating and pattern matching these two sources–which takes a lot of time and effort. Further complicating the matter is the fact that git, Jira, and other common tools don’t really do anything for driving business outcomes. Engineering leaders live between two worlds and have a dual mandate to blend operational excellence and business impact together–affecting their resourcing decisions, ability to hit deadlines, and whether they can deliver software that moves the needle.
The problem with so many tools is:
Lack of visibility - Most teams aren’t great at project hygiene which means the board is outdated and incomplete.
Lack of detail - “In Progress” means 100 different things so you have to piece together the details from different people and tools.
Lack of insight - Dev leaders can only solve problems if they know where to look. Without seeing the bottlenecks, you can’t fix them. Many of the tools available today only provide shallow visibility into operational metrics–starting and stopping with DORA or measuring lines of code.
Lack of alignment - Translating engineering to executives is hard enough. Without concrete data about how, your team really spends their time or how they’re allocating their resources–and how those decisions impact the business–it’s impossible.
Lack of workflow optimization - Other tools made specifically for devs are overly focused on helping them code better–which is only about 25% of their day. The non-coding work–meetings, status updates, planning sessions, housekeeping, code reviews, and meeting merge standards–is what needs to be streamlined to maximize productivity and keep devs coding (their happy place).
I already have Software Delivery Management capabilities within my CI/CD toolchain. Isn’t this redundant?
This looks like just another thing I would need to manage.
My CEO doesn’t care about engineering metrics, how does this help me deliver more features?
I can get all of this information from my project management tool.
READY TO LEAD WITH
ENGINEERING INTELLIGENCE
INNOVATION?
Multiple teams across Asia are boosting their revenue with DevBoost! You too can join this growth journey.